Grado SR60e vs SR80e

Grado SR60e vs SR80e – Best Headphones in Market

Grado Labs is an intimate run business that works out of Brooklyn, New York. Rather than mass-producing their headphones in Chinese plants like most headphones’ makers do, they invest profoundly close by making every one of their Grado headphones. Grado Labs is a well-adorned brand among numerous audiophiles and in light of current circumstances.

Beginning of Prestige Series

Since its inception in 1953, Grado has persistently offered decidedly manufactured products that made with a degree of care and detail once in a while observed. Even though this reputation has served them well, it has likewise made the feeling that everything the organization makes is costly.

Grado proceeds with its Prestige Series by improving in overall sound and affectability. This cheap headphone is among the best in its value extend on the off chance that you are searching for an open soundstage and music that is clear and brief.

Highly Recommended

Grado SR60e Headphone Review

Grado SR60e Headphone

Editor's Choice

Grado SR80e Headphone Review 

Grado SR80e Headphone

Most Popular Models of these Headphones

Two of the most mainstream models from the Prestige series are the Grado SR60e and Grado SR80e headphones. They’re mainstream since they’re very moderate for an open back headphone and have an appealing retro style. Be that as it may, with just $20 distinction in cost, what makes the Grado SR80e cost only somewhat more than the SR60e.

New “e” Prestige Series

Quick forward to today, and we have the most recent generation of the SR60. The Grado SR60e is a piece of the new “e” Prestige Series of headphones, where Grado is highlighting sonic quality in a worth package.

Numerous individuals prescribe Grado SR80e as an incredible starter open-back headphone as a result of the value range and quality. There are many stunning audits on the web, and that got us interested.

1st Product

Grado SR60e Headphone Review

Grado SR60e is an open-back, over-the-ear headphone using a powerful driver. With a 32ohm impedance and affectability of 99.8db at 1mW, these are anything but difficult to drive with any convenient gadget. Within, the Grado SR60e features another driver design and additional wire add-on to the driver.

Grado SR60e Headphone Review


Grado has upgraded upon its exemplary SR60 plan with the new “e” series model. The expanded affectability settles on the Grado SR60e, a phenomenal decision if you plan on utilizing them with a versatile gadget like an iPhone. Evaluation SR60e incorporates:

  • Full-Range Sound Reproduction
  • Includes 1/4″ Connector
  • Dynamic Transducer Type:
  • Open Air Operating Principle
  • 20 – 20,000 Hz Frequency Response
  • 8 dB SPL 1mW
  • 32 ohms Standard Impedance
  • .1 dB Driver Coordinated dB


  • Headphones
  • Warranty
  • Grado story-sheet
  • 5mm Brilliant Connector


  • Excellence headphone sound for pennies on the dollar.
  • This most recent generation sounds far and away superior on convenient gadgets.
  • Excellent Sound
  • Original and graceful vintage design.
  • Sturdiness and hindrance of materials.
  • Weight dispersed over the entire body.
  • Medium-high frequencies reproduced well indeed.
  • Among the least expensive open-back headphones we’ve seen


  • Some pressure in the midrange, not for bass oddities.
  • Not entirely handy
  • The comfort level is low.
  • Bass didn’t stress enough.
Grado SR60e Verdict

The Grado SR60e is your first open door on the planet, which is a full-range sound. Suppose you’re searching for the best sound presentation to value proportion, the Grado SR60e is a unique arrangement. You may have the option to recover a pair of open pair of headphones for less, yet I would be astonished if they came anyplace close to sounding as high.

2nd Product

Grado SR80e Headphone Review 

The Grado SR80e are on-ear headphones, the new form of the SR80i discharged the more significant part 10 years prior. Headphones have changed bounty in that time, yet the SR80e is a lot of like the SR80i, however, with a marginally improved form and updated drivers.

SR80e proves flawed for tuning in on transports, trains, or out on the town in urban areas, regarding the sound quality, you get at the cost — astounding headphones for the individuals who wouldn’t worry giving up practicality for sound quality. While the open-back design isn’t reasonable for noisy conditions.

Grado SR80e Headphone Review 


The Grado SR80e headphones sound outstandingly useful for $100 and are likewise pleasant to wear. Evaluation SR80e incorporates:

  • 40mm dynamic drivers
  • 5mm wire with 6.3mm connector included
  • 8m wire
  • Open-back cups
  • Foam cushions


  • Headphones
  • Warranty Card
  • Grado story-sheet
  • 5mm Brilliant Connector


  • Vital and point by point sound
  • Fast, forceful bass
  • Stereo imaging is increasingly open and regular.
  • Very decent retro design.
  • Strength and vigor of materials.
  • The yields on medium-high frequencies.
  • Good esteem for cash.


  • Leaky design
  • Less than extravagant comfort
  • The open-back plan gives noise access; secure attachment isn’t perfect with numerous cell phone cases.
  • The support offered at a low level.
  • No sound protection.
  • Low power and not quick-tempered at all

What is the primary contrast between Grado sr60e vs sr80e?

The principle contrast between Grado SR60e vs SR80e is their sonic performance. SR80e headphones are superior to SR60e. Also, on the off chance that you think about their distinction in numbers, SR80e’s headphones are 10% to 15% ahead than SR60e’s. They have almost a similar form and solace quality.

Final Verdict

As we notice, the two headphones have excellent execution. And in the two headphones, you won’t see any distinction. To you, likewise, I observed no difference in their features and specifications. In general, the Grado SR80e did somewhat for me.

At sub $100, this pair of open-back headphones enable newbies to evaluate something other than expected without using up every last cent. The main distinction between the two headphones is their sonic Performance. SR80e has a slight superiority on everything contrasted with SR60e, for example,

  • SR80e is somewhat more straightforward than SR60e.
  • Detailed sound than SR60e.
  • Solid Brass, and so on.

Like if you are a fanatic of EDM or bass-overwhelming songs, you will improve somewhere else because the Grado SR80e won’t give you the punch that you want. Be that as it may, the headphones did very well fortunes that are dynamic and complex, and you will enjoy your playlist if full of those songs.


  1. Abertlyday
  2. CharlesLet
  3. CharlesLet
  4. CharlesLet
  5. CharlesLet
  6. CharlesLet
  7. CharlesLet
  8. CharlesLet
  9. amb
  10. Michaeldob
  11. Michaeldob
  12. Michaeldob
  13. Michaeldob
  14. Michaeldob
  15. Jamesamask
  16. Jamesamask
  17. Jamesamask
  18. CraigFlivy
  19. CraigFlivy
  20. CraigFlivy
  21. AndrewSkymn
  22. AndrewSkymn
  23. AndrewSkymn
  24. AndrewSkymn
  25. AndrewSkymn
  26. AndrewSkymn
  27. UFA
  28. Mug
  29. nikon d7500 cost
  30. Georgespimb
  31. Georgespimb
  32. Robertfor
  33. ShelbyRom
  34. Stephencow
  35. Georgespimb
  36. Williambek
  37. Homercruth
  38. Williambek
  39. EdwardPhobe
  40. Anthonyraind
  41. Ronaldbep
  42. Raymondpak
  43. Chesterbow
  44. GeorgeFridE
  45. JefferyNum
  46. Isiahgot
  47. Robinnog
  48. JefferyNum
  49. Isiahgot
  50. JefferyNum
  51. GeorgeFridE
  52. JefferyNum
  53. Isiahgot
  54. JefferyNum
  55. Isiahgot
  56. GeorgeFridE
  57. JefferyNum
  58. Isiahgot
  59. JefferyNum
  60. MichaelAxoky
  61. Danielunets
  62. Stevenrab
  63. DavidVat
  64. DarrellFab
  65. DanielSkype
  66. Stevenrab
  67. MichaelAxoky
  68. DarrellFab
  69. FrankImmer
  70. MichaelAxoky
  71. DavidVat
  72. Stevenrab
  73. DarrellFab
  74. DanielSkype
  75. Danielunets
  76. FrankImmer
  77. MichaelAxoky
  78. Anthonydip
  79. FrankImmer
  80. RobertBaB
  81. Robincaf
  82. PhillipNom
  83. WilliamPEN
  84. AllanRow
  85. Robincaf
  86. Brandonquony
  87. Jamesphili
  88. RobertoNut
  89. Douglasmep
  90. Jefferydus
  91. Larrygib
  92. Richarddut
  93. Steveruits
  94. Arthurfen
  95. Jamesdex
  96. Larrygib
  97. KevinGow
  98. Steveruits
  99. Jefferydus
  100. Arthurfen
  101. Larrygib
  102. Jefferydus
  103. Steveruits
  104. Jefferydus
  105. Richarddut
  106. Larrygib
  107. Douglasmep
  108. Steveruits
  109. ThomasalonS
  110. KeithBerve
  111. GeraldBaw
  112. MatthewTarse
  113. Georgereith
  114. RichardSlomo
  115. GeraldBaw
  116. ThomasalonS
  117. Georgereith
  118. GeraldBaw
  119. ThomasalonS
  120. KeithBerve
  121. Georgereith
  122. GeraldBaw
  123. ThomasalonS
  124. MatthewTarse
  125. Georgereith
  126. GeraldBaw
  127. ThomasalonS
  128. Jessejurgy
  129. RobertPal
  130. Jeffreypeeft
  131. Lelandenums
  132. Careynum
  133. GeorgeUnund
  134. Thomaswholi
  135. RobertPal
  136. Jeffreypeeft
  137. GerardDip
  138. MichaelElend
  139. Jamesdon
  140. JamesRooca
  141. ThomasElect
  142. Darnellphess
  143. Dustinetele
  144. Daviddet
  145. MichaelTheot
  146. Darnellphess
  147. Dustinetele
  148. Daviddet
  149. Darnellphess
  150. ThomasElect
  151. Dustinetele
  152. Darnellphess
  153. Daviddet
  154. Dustinetele
  155. Danielper
  156. Darnellphess
  157. DennisBit
  158. Daviddet
  159. Dustinetele
  160. Darnellphess
  161. ThomasElect
  162. Dustinetele
  163. Daviddet
  164. Darnellphess

Leave a Reply